Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shaggy Snodgrass's avatar

I can't imagine you could have this general opinion and "prefer Clapton to Cream", as Cream was miles more energetic and colossal than any other project its members had, except for Ginger Baker's Air Force when he had the Gurwitz brothers in it.

But anyway. "Creative tension" often seems better from outside; but it wears on you over the course of years, the frustration is corrosive and cumulative. I've worked for (regional) "name acts" and groups a lot, and their dynamics internally are different; often the "names" are perfectly fine, it's just that the perception that the previous groups evoked was like amphetamines to critics, and they were super-mad to be deprived of it and took it out on the solo projects. A lot of these "legacy acts" benefit heavily from the collective halo of critical hindsight; even tho' they were a product of time and place, reflected such, and said critics drew meaning and cultural power from interacting with them. Times end, places change; and said writers react to that by pushing Nostalgia (and thereby their own "I Was There" credentials) and denigrating everything else after.

Blake Nelson's avatar

I was in a band in college and briefly afterward. Loved being a member of a band. Liked how it was the name of the band on the bill. Not my name,. I was safely anonymous in the band. Later I became a writer. Then I was a MY NAME guy. I was known as MY NAME. When as a band you played with another band which was a MY NAME band, you knew they would be fucked up in some way. Their ego was out of control. But as a writer you have no choice. Your brand is your name. You become the dreaded MY NAME guy.

26 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?